In August (2009) SAS, the leader in business analytics software and services and the largest independent vendor in the business intelligence market, announced:

The new version of SAS® Curriculum Pathways®, is available at no cost to educators in all 50 states.  SAS Curriculum Pathways provides standards-based content in the core academic disciplines of English, mathematics, social studies, science and Spanish for grades 8-12. 

Normally, this site is not used to promote products. 
SAS Curriculum Pathways is FREE in all 50 states with no strings attached!

Listen to student and teacher comments.

Want to learn more about SAS Curriculum Pathways?

Register for a FREE subscription.
Add Comment
 
 
According to Phi Delta Kappa, "The Curriculum Management Audit is a third-party examination of the curriculum design and delivery system of a school or school district. Both curriculum policy and the system in which curriculum functions are analyzed by the audit team. The report provides specific recommendations to improve those functions."

According to Wiggins and McTighe (2007), "The job is not to hope that optimal learning will occur, based on our curriculum and initial teaching.  The job is to ensure that learning occurs, and when it doesn't, to intervene in altering the syllabus and instruction decisively, quickly, and often" (p. 55).

Examples of Curriculum Management Audits:

Anchorage School District (Alaska)

Clover Park School District (Washington)  

San Bernardino City Unified School District (California)

Wake County Public School System (North Carolina)

Frequently Asked Questions About the WCPSS Curriculum Audit

If your school district has completed a Curriculum Management Audit, please share your thoughts. 

How did it help you improve your work as an educator? 

What were the benefits of the Curriculum Management Audit? 

Did you conduct the audit through Phi Delta Kappa or did you develop a different evaluation instrument for your school district's curriculum audit? 

If curriculum alignment is the goal in most school systems, then why do districts fail to conduct a Curriculum Management Audit? 

School districts must confront the brutal facts of their current reality in order to improve (Collins, 2001).

References:

Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: why some companies make the leap and others
         don't.  New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and
        achievement. Alexandria, VA: Assocition for Supervision and Curriculum
        Development.
Add Comment
 
 
Fifteen years ago, Allan Glatthorn wrote Developing a Quality Curriculum.  This book provides teachers, administrators and other stakeholders with curriculum development guidelines and tools which support the ongoing work of K-12 Curriculum Development.

Too often, educators develop the ideal curriculum or the written curriculum, but fail to create tools for assessing a school district's curriculum.  In Toward a Coherent Curriculum: The 1985 ASCD Yearbook, Stellar wrote, "The curriculum in numerous schools lacks clarity and, more important, coherence.  Students move from teacher to teacher and subject to subject along a curriculum continuum that may or may not exhibit planned articulation" (p. v).

The attached chart was developed by Glatthorn (1994).  Educators may use this chart or adapt it to meet the needs of your school district.  If school districts are in the process of developing curriculum on an assembly line and then mass producing a new curriculum for a different subject the next year, then educators may never see curriculum alignment or the strengths and weaknesses of the written and taught curriculum.  Questions number 11, 12, and 15 focus on monitoring the curriculum, implementing the curriculum and conducting a curriculum audit.

Following are the organizational components needed to accomplish effective curriculum work.  Using this chart, indicate a need by placing a check in the "Need" column.  Prioritize the checked items with the following scale:

1 - High Priority
2 - Middle Priority
3 - Low Priority

Use the results to plan next steps. 

This book may be purchased for under $10 at Amazon Books.  While 2009 marks the fifteenth anniversary of this book, the advice is still applicable to K-12 Curriculum Developers.
Add Comment
 
 
If you have ever worked with a team of teachers to develop curriculum maps, align the school district's curriculum, or evaluate curriculum, you understand that curriculum development is a political act.  Fenwick English (2000) wrote, "Knowledge is never neutral.  The selection of knowledge is fundamentally a political act of deciding who benefits from selecting what in the school's curriculum and who is excluded or diminished" (p. 30).

This past week, the Common Core State Standards Initiative was under fire from critics.  The controversy involved the committee members and ties they may have  which could influence 'what' is added to the Common Core State Standards.  Critics feel like the relationships between people who are designing education policy and their various roles in government and business should be made transparent to the public. 

Two Questions Should Be Asked When Evaluating Standards and Curriculum Documents.

1.  Whose politics are represented in this curriculum?

2.  Whose values are represented in this curriculum?

"Curriculum is always a means to somebody's end.....No selection of curriculum content can be considered politically neutral" (2000, p. 53).  If you are asked to review curriculum or develop curriculum, then you should be careful to avoid bias.  What is good for your own child may not be good for every child.  Politics are unavoidable when it comes to curriculum development, but educators can improve the curriculum development process by seeking multiple perspectives.  For additional information on Curriculum Decisions visit http://tiny.cc/TTS0P

View Full Story
http://tiny.cc/g5E6W
Conflict of Interest Arises as Concern in Standards Push
By Mary Ann Zehr
November 2, 2009

References:
English, F.W. (2000). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning, and
         auditing the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Add Comment
 
 
When I meet educators at a state conference or I am introduced to an author, one of the questions I like to ask is, "What are you currently reading?"  When I meet Superintendents, College Professors, Classroom Teachers, Principals, and Educational Consultants they often cite the same authors.  The following list contains Ten Books Every Curriculum Developer Should Read. 

Please feel free to share your opinion regarding one or more of the books listed.

1.  Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction (1949)
     Ralph W. Tyler

2.  Understanding by Design (Expanded 2nd Edition - 2005)
     Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe

3.  Deciding What to Teach and Test: Developing, Aligning, and Auditing the
     Curriculum (2000)
     Fenwick W. English

4.  Developing a Quality Curriculum (1994)
     Allan A. Glatthorn

5.  Mapping the Big Picture: Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12 (1997)
     Heidi Hayes Jacobs

6.  Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom (2007)
     H. Lynn Erickson

7.  Common Formative Assessments: How to Connect Standards-Based
     Instruction and Assessment (2006) 
     Larry Ainsworth & Donald Viegut

8.  Unwrapping the Standards: A Simple Process to Make Standards Manageable
     (2003)
     Larry Ainsworth

9.  Power Standards: Identifying the Standards that Matter the Most (2003)
     Larry Ainsworth

10.  Schooling by Design: Mission, Action, and Achievement (2007)
       Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe 

What are you currently reading?  Do you have a favorite curriculum and instruction book?  Please feel free to share books that have influenced your work with curriculum design, curriculum alignment and staff development. 
2 Comments
 
 
In 2009, the National Governors Association developed a policy position
regarding education reform.  The policy position outlines the role of governors, alignment of the education system, state accountability systems, adequate yearly progress, rigorous curricula, funding, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, and voluntary international benchmarking. 

The following excerpt from the policy position shows how far the United States has come since the No Child Left Behind Act became law and it shows the commitment of the National Governors Association to continue seeking methods for supporting public education, while holding educators and policy makers accountable to high standards in all fifty states.

"Education is primarily and properly a state responsibility. Governors also
 recognize the important and supporting role of the federal government in 
 education. The federal government can assist states by providing extra
 and essential assistance for students most in need, recognizing and
 assisting teachers, and supporting governors’ leadership authority
 through NCLB.

  In reauthorizing NCLB, Congress should reinforce and support sound
  state education practices, roll back restrictions on states’ ability to align
  and integrate delivery systems for students, assist and recognize the
  needs of our nation’s teachers, and ultimately, support state efforts to
  raise student achievement. For this reason, governors urge Congress to
  adopt and support the following recommendations to further reform
  elementary and secondary education" 
                                                   (National Governors Association,2009).

As of the fall of 2009, two years after the 2001 law was set to expire,
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and No Child Left
Behind Act still has not been reauthorized. It is possible that Congress will
reauthorize ESEA in 2010 or 2011.  Teachers, families, tax payers, politicians, policy makers, state departments of education, local education agencies and other stakeholders will have the opportunity to address state standards,
curriculum and instruction, and state assessments.

What are your thoughts regarding the reauthorization of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act and No Child Left Behind?  Should the United States develop national standards for education?  Should NCLB remain the same?  Should a dramatic overhaul take place?  If No Child Left Behind supports student achievement, then how can it be improved?

References:
National Governors Association. (2008). Benchmarking for success: Ensuring
       U.S. students receive a world-class education. Retrieved September 18,
       2009, from http://www.achieve.org/files/BenchmarkingforSuccess.pdf.

National Governors Association. (2009). Policy position: Education reform.
Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.8358ec82f5b198d1
8a278110501010a0/?vgnextoid=20ca9e2f1b091010VgnVCM1000001a01010aR
CRD

No Child Left Behind Act, Public Law 107-110. (2002). Retrieved October 22,
   2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf.
Add Comment
 
 
Picture
Hidden Curriculum
During the month of October thousands of children will dress in costumes and attend fall festivals in their community. As we carve pumpkins and share ghost stories, it reminds me of the "hidden" curriculum in schools. The "hidden" curriculum is the unintended curriculum. "It defines what students learn from the physical environment, the policies, and the procedures of the school"
                                                                            (Glatthorn & Jailall, 2009, p. 110).

The main factors that seem to constitute the hidden curriculum are:

• Time Allocation
• Space Allocation
• Use of discretionary funds
• Student discipline
• Physical Appearance
• Student Activities Program
• Communication
• Power

Educators should analyze the “hidden” curriculum on a regular basis. When an analysis of the “hidden” curriculum has been completed, the principal and the teachers should identify those "hidden" messages that do not reflect the intended curriculum.

Source:
Glatthorn, A.A. & Jailall, J.M. (2009). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping
       what is taught and tested.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Examples of the “Hidden” Curriculum in Schools

In a school that administers common formative assessments on a regular basis, a student may ask the teacher, “Why do we have tests every three weeks?” If the teacher replies, “We want all of our students to be prepared for the End-of-Grade tests in the spring”, then the “hidden” message will imply that the purpose for school is to prepare for a single test. The message schools want to send is that learning is an ongoing process and their intention is to develop lifelong learners. However, the answer that the teacher gave indicates that common formative assessments are intended to prepare students for a high-stakes test, rather than a method to assess students’ understanding of the current unit of study.

In a school that teaches social studies three days per week, a student may ask the teacher, “Why do we study social studies less than other subjects?” If the teacher replies, “Students won’t be tested in social studies until high school," then the student learns that social studies is not as important as the other subjects. If the student follows the teacher’s advice, then the student will not place much value on the following concepts, democracy, citizenship, courage, change, rights, responsibilities, voting, leadership, and government. This example demonstrates how the “hidden” curriculum interferes with the written and taught curricula in schools.

Questions for Administrators and Collaborative Teams

1.  What are the “hidden” messages that students receive in our school/school
     district?

2.  How do the current “hidden” messages interfere with the intended
     curriculum?

3.  What can teachers and administrators do to correct unintended messages?

4.  Does the “hidden” curriculum exist in our school, or is it a “ghost story”
     without supporting evidence?

5.  Is it possible to have a “hidden” curriculum every year since educators are
     humans and humans are not perfect?
Add Comment
 
 
The following quote provides an opportunity for educators to discuss opportunity to learn, curriculum development, essential learnings, enduring understandings, the enacted curriculum, curriculum alignment and pacing.  Additional resources on these topics may be found by clicking on the topics listed in the blog archives.  This quote explains the complexity of K-12 curriculum development. 

“The enacted curriculum, the actual instruction delivered in the classroom, is ultimately controlled by the teacher, negotiated with a particular set of students at a particular time.  In designing the enacted curriculum, teachers make content decisions about how much time to spend, what topics to cover within what time, which students are to study what content and to what standards of achievement.  Collectively, these four teacher content decisions determine school provided opportunity to learn (Porter et al. 1988).  As a result, there are substantial differences in the enacted curriculum provided by teachers teaching ostensibly the same course, even within the same school” (Porter, 1989).   

Questions for Discussion:

1.  Does our school system have a process for curriculum development?

2.  Does our school system use technology to support ongoing collaboration
    and professional conversations regarding K-12 curriculum decisions?

3.  What is our current reality?  In other words, what is the enacted
     curriculum?

4.  What are the four teacher content decisions that determine school
     provided opportunity to learn?

5.  How can this short quote help our staff improve our current K-12
    curriculum development process? 


Reference:

Porter, A. C. (1994). Standards and school improvement in the 1990's:
      Issues and Promise. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 421-449.




Add Comment
 
 

Ten Myths About Curriculum Development

Picture
Curriculum development is the heart of education.  Curriculum developers range from politicians to school administrators and classroom teachers.  This article shares ten myths about curriculum development.  When curriculum is misunderstood or not aligned, it has a detrimental effect on student achievement.


1.  Curriculum should be developed by the Central Office staff and delivered by
     classroom teachers.

2.  State Standards are the curriculum.

3.  Curriculum development and revision should take place once every five years.

4.  Curriculum development should not become a political process.

5.  Curriculum and pacing should be designed to follow the adopted textbook.

6.  If educators select verbs which require higher-order thinking skills, then the
     district will have a rigorous curriculum.

7.  When curriculum maps are completed, then teachers should move to a new
     district project.

8.  If every sixth grade teacher uses the same curriculum, then teaching will
     become scripted.

9.  If a curriculum is developed, then teachers will create lessons and units using
     the district's curriculum.

10.  If the district develops a strong curriculum, then student understanding will
       increase.

Please feel free to post your thoughts on the Ten Myths About Curriculum Development or share additional myths. 
Add Comment
 
 
Picture
Curriculum development is an ongoing process which requires collaboration, conflict-resolution and reflection.  Too often, schools approach curriculum development as a product to be created.  When teachers come to a fork in the road, they often blame weaknesses in the document and resort to their own curriculum.  It is difficult, if not impossible, to have curriculum alignment when each teacher chooses essential skills and key concepts in isolation.

Collaboration:  Since classroom teachers decide what every student should know and be able to do, then they should be involved in the curriculum development process.  Unpacking the standards, curriculum mapping, unit development, writing generalizations, developing essential questions and creating common formative assessments are each opportunities for collaboration.

Conflict-Resolution:  Conflict is often avoided when teachers discuss curriculum development.  Lencioni (2002) identified "The Fear of Conflict" as one of the five dysfunctions of teams.  When teachers debate which skills are essential and what content can be ommited, curriculum development becomes a matter of conflict resolution.  When teacher teams embrace conflict and encourage conflicting opinions they are supporting student achievement.

Reflection:  When teacher teams reflect on the written, taught and assessed curricula, they will improve the district's curriculum.  When teachers develop curriculum and fail to assess its effectiveness, it is difficult to know if the curriculum is meeting the needs of each student. 

Five Questions For Curriculum Developers:

1.  Does our school have a 'guaranteed curriculum'?

2.  Is our curriculum aligned (Vertically and Horizontally)?

3.  Do teachers have a tool or method for communicating the strengths and
     weaknesses of the 'guaranteed curriculum'?

4.  When teachers develop common formative assessments, do they use the
     district's curriculum as a guide for developing assessments?

5.  Are teachers meeting on a regular basis to reflect on the written, taught, and
     assessed curricula?

If curriculum drives the work of teacher teams, then schools must create time for teachers to collaborate, engage in conflict and provide time during the school day for reflection and revision.  Curriculum development should be a priority in schools, rather than something that is handed to teachers as a top-down product.  When teachers collaborate to develop the curriculum, they will have
co-workers who support them when they come to a fork in the road in instruction.
Add Comment