K-12 Curriculum Development

 
 
Picture
http://www.flickr.com/photos/phill_dvsn/2239091337/sizes/s/









The article below introduces educators to Purpose-Driven Curriculum and Instruction.  If you wish to build a Purpose-Driven Curriculum, take a moment to ask yourself and a co-worker or team of co-workers the Eight Questions Which Drive the Work of a Purpose-Driven School System (attached).

eight_questions_which_guide_the_work_of_a_purpose-driven_school_system.doc
File Size: 31 kb
File Type: doc
Download File

what_is_a_purpose-driven_curriculum.pdf
File Size: 226 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

 
 
Picture
In December, many Americans make donations to charitable organizations.  Some schools sponsor an Angel Tree and provide gifts to students and families who may not be able to provide gifts for their families at Christmas.  The American Red Cross has their annual fund drive at malls and grocery stores across the United States.  December is a month where giving is in the air.  Some Americans do not consider giving gifts or sharing their income with others between January – November, but giving is popular at the end of the year.

A recent poll indicated nearly 90 percent of Americans plan to donate to charity this holiday season.

What can school districts “give” students and families in the 2010 school year?  Marzano cited a ‘guaranteed and viable’ curriculum' as the number one factor impacting student achievement.  A gift that would have a lasting impact on students and families would be the development of a district curriculum which is both guaranteed and viable.

Other Gift Ideas:
Assessment FOR Learning (Stiggins)

A Purpose-Driven Curriculum

A Timely Curriculum

A 21st Century Curriculum

Opportunity to Learn (for all students)

If you are a K-12 Curriculum Developer, take a moment to reflect on the benefits of giving one of these gifts to the students in your school district.  If your school budget is tight, you can still donate your talent and time to develop a curriculum which meets the needs of a diverse student population and guarantees that each student will receive the opportunity to learn.  Wiles (2009) wrote, "Curriculum development is the essential function of school leadership.  Whether the role is carried out by a principal, an assistant principal for curriculum, a team leader, a department head, or by leading classroom teachers, the curriculum defines all other roles in a school" (p.2). 

Improving the lives of students is our business and your gift could impact an entire generation!

References:

Marzano, R. What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA:
           Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,


Wiles, J. (2009). Leading curriculum development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

 
 
Picture
Fran Rees (1991) wrote How to LEAD Work Teams: Facilitation Skills. While this book was not written for the field of education, it has resources that can improve our collective efforts as curriculum developers.  Curriculum development is a collaborative effort and it requires multiple perspectives.  This article will describe how Rees’ book can help school districts as they continue to develop, revise and reflect on the curriculum in K-12 schools.

Our school district has embraced the professional learning community model.  A professional learning community consists of a group of teachers who meet on a weekly basis to identify what each student should know and be able to do.  In an elementary school, a team could consist of each third grade teacher in a building.  At the secondary level, a team could be all of the Algebra teachers in a high school.  Ongoing reflection and scheduled team meetings help teachers learn strategies which are effective.  Curriculum development and craft knowledge are shared in team meetings and through teacher blogs and emails.

Teaching is a profession where one teacher is assigned a classroom of students.  Traditionally, teachers have worked in isolation, preparing lessons for students and assigning letter grades based on student achievement of the determined learning outcomes.  Rees’ (1991) research shares how teachers should approach team meetings.

How to L.E.A.D. Teams

Leaders can use a simple four-step model: 

L  ead with a clear purpose
E  mpower to participate

A  im for consensus
D  irect the process


In the absence of a clear purpose or identified learning goals, students are not given the opportunity to learn essential concepts and skills which will prepare them for the next level of learning.  It is comfortable and safe for teachers to come to consensus when they meet.  Most teachers do not wish to end a meeting with conflict or a debate.  This model is not saying that teachers should avoid debate or that consensus is the only goal of a team meeting.  Teachers without a clear purpose and groups with a single leader may not be increasing student achievement simply by coming to consensus.  Another valuable chapter in this book is chapter three which is titled, Getting People to Work Together.  

As teachers begin to work together on building-level teams and district wide committees, team building skills and facilitation skills will become an important component of professional development.  We must keep in mind that teachers value collaboration, but the culture in education has taught us to work in isolation.

Additional Team Resources:

Five Dysfunctions of a Team

Professional Learning Communities

Purpose Driven Curriculum


References:
Rees, F. (1991). How to lead work teams: Facilitation Skills. San Diego, CA:
        Pfeiffer and Company.

 
Back-to-School 08/04/2009
 
“As teachers engage in this dialogue regarding what their students must know and be able to do as a result of this unit they are about to teach,
they become more clear, more consistent, and more confident in their ability to help all students learn” (
DuFour, DuFour, & Eaker, 2006, p. 43).

This quote reminds us of the power of teacher collaboration and determining essential learner outcomes at the beginning of the school year.  When I entered the teaching profession, I was given a key to my classroom, a grade book, a set of Teacher's Guides, the state standards and a lesson plan book.  While a first year teacher has creative ideas, a passion for teaching, and a desire to make a difference in the lives of students, a collaborative team is more powerful.  

Guiding Questions to Consider When Teams Meet:

1)  What essential understandings and skills do our students need?

2)  Which standards can be clustered or incorporated into others?

3)  What are the Big Ideas/Enduring Understandings I want students to
     discover on their own after learning these concepts and skills?

The time it takes to meet as a team (vertical, horizontal, content alike, district wide, or other team structure) is worth the time and effort.  "When school staff have a more informed conception of curriculum, a teacher's daily decisions about how to deliver instruction not only affect student achievement in that classroom but also future student achievement, for it is assumed that students will be entering the next classroom prepared to handle a more sophisticated or more expanisve level of work" (Zmuda, Kuklis & Kline, 2004, p. 122). While several theorists and professional organizations have debated the ‘what’ of curriculum, implementation of curriculum and curriculum decisions are made daily by K-12 classroom teachers.  Begin the year with the end in mind and provide teachers with time to work as a collaborative team.
 
 
Picture
Smedley said, "A speech without a purpose is like a journey without a destination" (as cited by Koegel, 2007, p. 34).  The same can be said about curriculum development.  A curriculum without a purpose is like a journey without a destination.  Do the teachers and administrators in your school system have agreed upon learning outcomes for students at the end of each grade level?  Do teachers and administrators have time scheduled throughout the school year to discuss which instructional strategies are working with certain grade levels or even with individual students?

The list below contains several of the skills and understandings that most teachers and parents would agree students should develop during the K-12 experience(s).  If a parent moved from another state or country and asked teachers in your school district which skills and understandings are taught in the seventh grade, would the parent receive the same answer from teachers at three different middle schools?

Using the list below, add skills and understandings that you feel are missing.  Are some of the identified skills more essential than others?  Should some of the skills be taught in each grade, K-12?  Should some of the skills be deemphasized due to the skills required by a changing workforce?  Most importantly, what is the purpose for including each of these skills or understandings in the K-12 curriculum?  Is your district's current curriculum meeting its intended purpose?  What can be done to realign the district's curiculum in order to meet the agreed upon purposes during the 2009-2010 school year?

1.   Citizenship     
2.   Geographic Awareness     
3.   Decoding Skills
4.   21st Century Learning Skills     
5.   Presentation Skills
6.   Writing Skills     
7.   Problem Solving Skills
8.   World Languages
9.   Literacy Skills
10. Self-Awareness
11. Character Education
12. Healthful Living
13. Personal Financial Literacy
14. Apply Mathematics in a variety of settings
15. Communication Skills
16. The Arts
17. Career Development
18. Interview Skills
19. Critical Thinking Skills
20. How to Apply Skills and Understandings     

"All learners benefit from and should receive instruction that reflects clarity about purposes and priorities of content."
                                                        -  Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe

References:

Koegel, T.J. (2007). The exceptional presenter. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group
         Press.

Tomlinson, C.A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and
        understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
        Curriculum Development.

 
 

In The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork, Maxwell (2001) wrote, "Every team needs a vision to give it direction.  A team without vision is, at worst, purposeless.  At best, it is subject to the personal (and sometimes selfish) agendas of its various teammates.  As the agendas work against each other, the team's energy and drive drain away" (p. 91).  He describes this as the Law of the Compass.



Questions for School Districts:

1)  How do we determine the essential learning outcomes for each student?

2)  How do we monitor student progress towards essential student learning
     outcomes?

3)  Does our school system have an aligned curriculum or does each teacher
     determine the essential learning outcomes in isolation?

4)  Does the written curriculum drive the work of teachers and teacher teams?

"Curriculum design and delivery face one fundamental problem in schools.  When the door is shut and nobody else is around, the classroom teacher can select and teach just about any curriculum he or she decides is appropriate" (English, 2000, p. 1). 

Wiggins (1995) wrote, "Curriculum guides must become more like a compass and a sextant - performance tasks and standards and troubleshooting guides.  We need more than a well-planned set of work requirements and supporting lesson ideas; we need clarity about how courses can help students attain objectives in the face of various adventures and detours.  That adjustment depends on knowing in advance the specific performance destination: the tasks students should be able to perform, and to what standard, as a result of our teaching" (p. 110).

References:

English, F.W. (2000). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning, and
        auditing the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 

Maxwell, J. (2001). The 17 indisputable laws of teamwork.  Nashville, TN: Thomas
        Nelson, Inc.

Wiggins, G. (1995). Curricular coherence and assessment: Making sure that
        the effect matches the intent. Beane, J.A. (Ed.). Toward a coherent
        curriculum: The 1995 ASCD yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for
        Supervision and Curriculum Development. 



 
 

Curriculum clutter impacts student achievement.  "When school staff have a more informed conception of curriculum, a teacher's daily decisions about how to deliver instruction not only affect student achievement in that classroom but also future student achievement, for it is assumed that students will be entering the next classroom prepared to handle a more sophisticated or more expansive level of work" (Zmuda, Kuklis & Kline, 2004, p. 122).

As schools enter the month of May, educators ask the following questions:

a)  How can we teach it all?

b)  Should we teach each standard well or should we prioritize the state
     standards?

c)  What skills and understandings should all students have by the end of this
     grade level/course?  How do we adjust our pacing to make these goals a
     reality in the upcoming school year?

One common complaint among teachers and administrators is the lack of time to reflect on the written, taught and received curriculum.  In August, teachers are beginning the school year and some complain that it is too early in the year to discuss the curriculum.  In March and April, teachers have spring break and other holidays which interfere with curriculum meetings.  In May, teachers are amazed that another school year is coming to a close.  In order to prevent curriculum clutter, schools should ask the following questions:

1.  What are the key concepts and skills in each unit of study?

2.  Did our pacing allow us to teach the key concepts and skills this year?

3.  Are we attempting to teach too many concepts and skills in some units?

4.  Are we teaching all key concepts and skills for mastery or should we aim for
     introducing some concpepts/skills and mastery of others?

5.  When will we schedule time to discuss the curriculum in 2009-2010?

In other words, how can we meet on a regular basis to avoid arriving in the
final weeks of the 2009-2010 school year feeling overwhelmed by curriculum clutter?  Wiggins and McTighe (2007) wrote, “Schooling at its best reflects a purposeful arrangement of parts and details, organized with deliberate intention, for achieving the kinds of learning we seek” (p. 9).


 
 

Thoughts for Teachers and Teacher Teams:

When you close the classroom door, how do you make decisions about 'what' to teach?  Do you use the same criteria for making decisions as your co-workers?  How do you decide what to assess?  Do your co-workers assess the same skills and concepts?  How do you make critical decisions about the state standards and pacing?  How do you communicate your decisions within your school?  How do you communicate your decisions within your school district (across schools)?  Is the taught curriculum aligned across schools in your district?  How do you know?

"If schools want to enhance their organizational capacity to boost student learning, they should work on building a professional community that is characterized by shared purpose, collaborative activity, and collective responsibility among staff" (Newmann & Wehlage, 1995, p. 37).

Reference:

Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center for Restructuring Schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

 


 
 

Benefits

1)  Improved Alignment

2)  Improved Communication

3)  Increased Relevance

4)  A Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum

5)  Equitable for all Students


What Does Research Tell Us About Purpose-Driven Curriculum?

Working on the Work (W.O.W.) entails teachers' purposefully creating, designing, identifying, or otherwise making available to students authentically engaging activities, programs, tasks, assignments, and opportunities to practice that result in students learning those things it is determined that students need to learn to be judged well educated.

                                                       -  Phillip Schlechty, Working on the Work (2002)


Many educational programs do not have clearly defined purposes.

                           - Ralph Tyler, Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction (1949)

Leadership involves purposes and direction.  Leaders know the ends toward which they are striving.  They pursue goals with clarity and tenacity, and are accountable for their accomplishments.

As cited by Robert Marzano in School Leadership that Works: From Research to Results. Leithwood, K.A. & Riehl, C. (2003). What do we really know about successful school leadership? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. 


The attached document outlines Purpose-Driven Curriculum and Instruction (Weber, 2008).




what_is_a_purpose-driven_curriculum.pdf
File Size: 226 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

 
 

Recently, I read a book written by Malcolm Gladwell titled, Outliers. Gladwell (2008) wrote, "Marita doesn't need a brand new school with acres of playing fields and gleaming facilities. She doesn't need a laptop, a smaller class, a teacher with a PhD, or a bigger apartment......All those things would be nice, of course. But they miss the point. Marita just needed a chance" (p. 268-269).

Gladwell suggests that superstar athletes are given access to good coaches, private lessons, and additional opportunities.  This quote made me struggle with answers to the following questions.

Questions for Educators:

1.  What does it look like when all students have a chance or an "opportunity to
     learn?"

2.  What role does K-12 curriculum development play in providing each student
     with an "opportunity to learn?"

3.  What policies and procedures need to be developed in order to guarantee
     that each student receives the "opportunity to learn" a guaranteed
     curriculum?

4.  Is it ethical for sixth graders at School A to receive a different curriculum
     (key concepts, skills, understandings) than the sixth graders at School B?

5.  If the opportunity to learn is critical to student success, why don't educators
     discuss "opportunity to learn" on a regular basis?

Please share your thoughts.