K-12 Curriculum Development

If you have ever worked with a team of teachers to develop curriculum maps, align the school district's curriculum, or evaluate curriculum, you understand that curriculum development is a political act.  Fenwick English (2000) wrote, "Knowledge is never neutral.  The selection of knowledge is fundamentally a political act of deciding who benefits from selecting what in the school's curriculum and who is excluded or diminished" (p. 30).

This past week, the Common Core State Standards Initiative was under fire from critics.  The controversy involved the committee members and ties they may have  which could influence 'what' is added to the Common Core State Standards.  Critics feel like the relationships between people who are designing education policy and their various roles in government and business should be made transparent to the public. 

Two Questions Should Be Asked When Evaluating Standards and Curriculum Documents.

1.  Whose politics are represented in this curriculum?

2.  Whose values are represented in this curriculum?

"Curriculum is always a means to somebody's end.....No selection of curriculum content can be considered politically neutral" (2000, p. 53).  If you are asked to review curriculum or develop curriculum, then you should be careful to avoid bias.  What is good for your own child may not be good for every child.  Politics are unavoidable when it comes to curriculum development, but educators can improve the curriculum development process by seeking multiple perspectives.  For additional information on Curriculum Decisions visit http://tiny.cc/TTS0P

View Full Story
http://tiny.cc/g5E6W
Conflict of Interest Arises as Concern in Standards Push
By Mary Ann Zehr
November 2, 2009

References:
English, F.W. (2000). Deciding what to teach and test: Developing, aligning, and
         auditing the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.