Nearly fifty years ago, Jerome Bruner wrote: "If the hypothesis.....introduced is true - that any subject can be taught to any child in some honest form - then it should follow that a curriculum ought to be built around the great issues, principles, and values that a society deems worthy of the continual concern of its members." - Jerome Bruner, The Process of Education, 1960 This statement is as true today as it was in 1960. Questions for Educators to Consider: 1. Can any subject be taught to any child in some honest form? 2. What do we expect all students to know and be able to do? 3. Do we have a process for identifying Essential Learning Outcomes for each course? 4. Do we have a clearly defined purpose for each course? (i.e., Thinking with the end in mind) 5. What current events, local issues, or community norms should be included in the curriculum? 6. Is the role of this course to prepare students with academic knowledge or do we want to develop students who can apply their understanding of content in an ethical manner? 7. Should each teacher identify what students should know and be able to do or should teacher teams or district teams work together to establish a common curriculum? What would Bruner recommend? 8. Should curriculum focus on state standards or should it go beyond the state standards to include locally determined Essential Learning Outcomes? 9. Is everything identified in the curriculum of equal importance? 10. What impact, if any, does it have on students if our school system has not developed a curriculum built around the great issues, principles, and values that a society deems worthy of the continual concern of its members? Teachers are more likely to implement a curriculum that has grown out of their own conversations and meetings, that allows for teacher autonomy and that represents their own beliefs about what should be taught - See Home-Grown Curriculum. References: Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CommentsLeave a Reply |

RSS Feed